Reflections

What I Learned From Saying No for an Entire Month

In June I tried saying no to everything I could say no to. Social events, commitments, "quick favours." Here's what I learned — including the parts that surprised me.

On this page 11 sections
  1. 1 What I expected
  2. 2 What surprised me
  3. 3 1. Saying no actually got harder over the month, not easier
  4. 4 2. About 40% of the things I said no to didn't actually need declining
  5. 5 3. Some of the no's I said felt right and some felt wrong
  6. 6 4. The yes-people were noticeably nice to me about it
  7. 7 5. I missed about three things I'd said no to. Not more.
  8. 8 What didn't change
  9. 9 What I do now
  10. 10 The thing I tell myself now
  11. 11 Try this

In June I tried something. I said no to everything I could say no to. Social events. Optional work commitments. "Quick favours." Coffees with people I actually liked but didn't have the energy for. The default response for an entire month was no.

Here's what I learned. Some of it I expected. Some of it I really didn't.

What I expected

I expected to be less tired. I expected to have more time. I expected to enjoy the time I had more, because there'd be less of it spent on things I didn't want to do.

All of these turned out to be true. Less interestingly true than I'd hoped.

What surprised me

1. Saying no actually got harder over the month, not easier

I'd expected the opposite. By week three, "no" was harder than by week one. The reason: by week three, the people I'd said no to in week one were still around. The accumulated social weight of having said no built up. I had to keep saying it to people who'd watched me say it.

By the end of the month I was making excuses ("I have a thing") rather than saying no, even though they were the same answer.

2. About 40% of the things I said no to didn't actually need declining

The exercise made me realise something I hadn't before: I'd been agreeing to things I didn't want to do. The new no-default exposed the old yes-default. About 40% of those things, when I looked again, I would have said no to even without the experiment. I just hadn't been paying attention to what I actually wanted.

That was the most useful realisation of the month.

3. Some of the no's I said felt right and some felt wrong

Not all no's are equal. Saying no to a vague networking lunch felt fine. Saying no to a friend's birthday because I was tired felt bad in a way that I should have listened to. The gut isn't always right, but it's usually right about the relational ones.

By week two I was breaking the experiment's rule for specific kinds of yes-events. I think this was correct.

4. The yes-people were noticeably nice to me about it

I'd worried I'd annoy people. Mostly the opposite. People who'd been on the receiving end of my chronic over-commitment had already noticed something was off. The no's landed more as "ah good, she's taking care of herself" than as "wow, what a flake."

The yes-default I'd been running was mostly serving me, not them. I overestimated how much they needed my yes.

5. I missed about three things I'd said no to. Not more.

This was the most surprising data point. I said no to maybe 30 things over the month. Three of them I genuinely regretted missing. Twenty-seven I didn't miss at all.

The 10% rate of regret reframed the whole experiment for me. The yes-default had been costing me much more than the no-default would.

What didn't change

Not everything. The expected gains weren't as dramatic as the experiment's premise suggested. I wasn't suddenly transformed. I had a slightly nicer June. The biggest changes weren't about the time I saved (it was less than I expected), but about the patterns I noticed (which I hadn't expected at all).

What I do now

Not "say no to everything." That's not sustainable, or even desirable. What I do is closer to a 24-hour rule: when someone asks for my time, I take 24 hours before agreeing. Not for important things — those I answer immediately. For optional things, the 24-hour pause does most of the work the no-month did.

Most yeses I would have given immediately become noes (or counter-proposals: "not this, but how about that?") with 24 hours of consideration.

The thing I tell myself now

When I'm tempted to say yes immediately, the question I ask is: "If this happened tomorrow, would I cancel something else to make it work?" If the answer is no, then I'm saying yes to something I'd cancel under any pressure. Which means I shouldn't say yes in the first place.

That question, more than the no-month itself, has changed how I commit to things.

Try this

I wouldn't recommend the full no-month. It was useful as an experiment; it would not be useful as a way of life.

What I would recommend: for one week, before saying yes to anything optional, take 24 hours to think about it. Just one week. See what you say no to that you would have said yes to. The pattern in those answers will tell you something about your defaults that you probably haven't quite admitted to yourself.

That's the actually useful part of this experiment. The rest is mostly story.